Animal Assisted Activities (AAA)

Farm animal-assisted intervention...

anthrozoology — Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:59:32 +1100

Pedersen, Ingeborg. Nordaunet, Trine. Martinsen, Egil Wilhelm. Berget, Bente. Braastad, Bjarne O.

Applications and benefits of Pet-Co-Relations Therapy. [Italian]

anthrozoology — Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:09:03 +1100

Petrantoni, G.

Animal-assisted interventions in internal and rehabilitation medicine: a review of the recent literature.

anthrozoology — Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:11:09 +1000

Munoz Lasa, S. Ferriero, G. Brigatti, E. Valero, R. Franchignoni, F.

Comparison of the short-term effects of horse trekking and exercising with a riding simulator on autonomic nervous activity.

anthrozoology — Mon, 02 May 2011 10:43:34 +1000

Matsuura, A.; Nagai, N.; Funatsu, A.; Irimajiri, M.; Yamazaki, A.; Hodate, K.;

Biophilia in animal-assisted interventions - fad or fact?

anthrozoology — Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:48:56 +1000

Joye, Y.

Biophilia in animal-assisted interventions - fad or fact?

anthrozoology — Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:20:05 +1000

Joye, Y. yannick.joye@econ.kuleuven.be

Hygiene measures for animal-assisted interventions in hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals and retirement homes

anthrozoology — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:12:24 +1100

Hoffmann, C.; Herr, C.; Eikmann, T.;
Umweltmedizin in Forschung und Praxis. 2010. 15: 3, 149-157

Active or passive interactions with animals in animal-assisted interventions can be of great physical (reduction of hypertension, cardiac and circulatory troubles, muscle relaxation, pain relief etc.) and psychosocial (reduction of loneliness, fear and hostility, improvement of self-confidence) benefit for patients. Since not all animal species are suitable for animal-assisted interventions, guidelines with regard to the animal species, the breed, origin, behaviour, age and the state of health should be compiled. In addition, with the primarily used animals (dogs and cats) certain basic conditions must be considered (minimum age, training etc.). Several potential risks are commonly stated as arguments against the use of therapy animals in the medical field (eg, transmission of infectious diseases, contact to ecto- and endoparasites, causing an increase of allergies).

To minimize the risk of infection, general constraints must be considered concerning the animal itself: vaccination, appropriate flea, tick and enteric parasite control program etc., the treatment rooms as well as to the staff and the patients. Especially for treatment of immunocompromised patients the general conditions have to be strictly defined. However, a general contact ban is not necessary. The requirements stated above are essentially also valid to pet keeping at retirement homes. Treatment in medical and dentist's practise can be considered a special problem and should be avoided as far as possible due to a the great number of uncertainty factors and people involved (guide dogs excepted). Once specific basic rules are considered animal supported therapy or contact to pets in health care settings does not appear to pose any greater risk to (immunocompromised) patients than would interactions with other people or the environment. Misconceptions about the transmission of infectious diseases by animals may cause families to get rid of their pets unnecessarily once new diagnoses are found. It can be much more harmful for the well-being and the health of immunocompromised patients to lose the contact with a beloved domestic animal than to potentially risk acquiring a zoonotic infection.

In order to ensure best possible legal certainty concerning animal presence in health care settings every institution should have a plan of action at the disposal of staff and patients with the therapy animal, describing measures suitable for prevention of infectious diseases, restrictions of access for the animals, i.e. to treatment rooms as well as disinfection measures in a specific hygiene plan. Furthermore the vaccinations and the treatment with topical parasiticides have to be individually documented for each animal.

Exploratory study of stress-buffering response patterns from interaction with a therapy dog

anthrozoology — Thu, 20 May 2010 13:43:09 +1000

Barker, S. B.; Knisely, J. S.; McCain, N. L.; Schubert, C. M.; Pandurangi, A. K.;

Exploratory study of stress-buffering response patterns from interaction with a therapy dog.

Anthrozoos. 2010. 23: 1, 79-91.

Abstract

This exploratory study builds on existing research on the physiological stress response to human-animal interactions in a non-clinical sample of adult dog-owners interacting with their own or an unfamiliar therapy dog under similar conditions. Participants were therapy-dog owners (TDO group; <i>n</i>=5) interacting with their own dogs and dog owners interacting with an unfamiliar therapy dog (AAA group; <i>n</i>=5). Following a 30minute baseline period, participants completed a stress task followed by a 30-minute dog interaction and then watched a neutral video for 60 minutes.

[Development and implementation of Animals-Assisted Therapy in a university hospital]. [Portuguese]

anthrozoology — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:42:56 +1100

Kobayashi, Cassia Tiemi. Ushiyama, Silvia Tiemi. Fakih, Flavio Trevisan. Robles, Roseli A M. Carneiro, Ieda Aparecida. Carmagnani, Maria Isabel Sampaio.

Preschoolers' Adherence to Instructions as a Function of Presence of a Dog and Motor Skills Task

anthrozoology — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:42:15 +1000

Gee, Nancy R.; Sherlock, Timothy R.; Bennett, Emily A.; Harris, Shelly L.

Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, Volume 22, Number 3, September 2009 , pp. 267-276(10)

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to examine preschoolers' (n = 11) ability to follow instructions in the presence or absence of a real dog while executing a variety of motor skills tasks.